CryptoGuardzIndependent crypto register
Read the binding document, check it against the issuing register, publish the disagreement18+ · Gambling carries risk of loss

Choose a language

The register is published in these languages. If this page has no version in one of them, you go to that language’s home page.

Photo: Jason Dent / UnsplashWallet register · comparison

Trust Wallet vs Exodus: what their terms and records say

In short, from the documents

Trust Wallet vs Exodus: what differs?

From their own documents, Trust Wallet and Exodus differ on who can block an address, the gambling clause (Trust Wallet: illegal gambling only; Exodus: not disclosed), the liability cap (100 US dollars against 1,000 US dollars) and recorded incidents (2 against 0). No winner is declared: which difference counts depends on how you use the wallet.

Documents last checked Reviewed by CryptoGuardz Register Desk, editorial desk

Disclosure: CryptoGuardz has no commercial relationship with Trust Wallet or Exodus and earns nothing if you install either. Every cell below is a field from one of the two register records, each built from documents the company publishes and dated when read. Corrections go to the corrections page.

Trust Wallet and Exodus side by side

Trust Wallet and Exodus from their register records. Not ranked and not scored.
FieldTrust WalletExodus
TypeSoftware walletSoftware wallet
Custody in the termsSelf-custodial, by the termsSelf-custodial, by the terms
Entity and governing lawNot disclosedHong Kong governing law, with a Hong Kong arbitral seatExodus Movement, Inc.Not stated as a jurisdiction of incorporation
Who can block an addressNone disclosed in the documents readThe wallet provider, under its own terms
Gambling clauseIllegal gambling onlyNot disclosed
Liability cap100 US dollars1,000 US dollars
Incidents on record2Latest 2025-12-240None found in primary sources; not proof of none
Cloud or hosted backupOfferedNot offered
Sub-service clauses94
Chains namedBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Tron, TONBitcoin, Ethereum, BNB Chain, Solana
Terms readTrust Wallet Terms of Service, last updated 1 January 2024Retrieved 2026-09-22 from trustwallet.comExodus Terms of Use, last updated 16 February 2026Retrieved 2026-09-28 from exodus.com

What differs, and who it matters to

This comparison reads two records and declares no winner. Trust Wallet's binding document is the Trust Wallet Terms of Service, last updated 1 January 2024; Exodus's is the Exodus Terms of Use, last updated 16 February 2026. On who can block an address, Trust Wallet: none disclosed in the documents read; Exodus: the wallet provider, under its own terms. That matters to anyone sending to an address a screening tool might flag, a casino deposit address included. On gambling, Trust Wallet's terms: illegal gambling only; Exodus's: not disclosed. That matters to anyone funding a casino from the wallet, because a breach can cost access to the app. On liability, Trust Wallet's terms: capped at 100 US dollars; Exodus's: capped at 1,000 US dollars. That matters only if the software itself causes a loss. The record holds 2 primary-source incidents for Trust Wallet and 0 for Exodus; a count of disclosures, not a measure of safety, and it matters most to past customers whose contact details or keys were involved. Trust Wallet's binding document does not name a contracting company, which matters to anyone who may need to bring a claim. Trust Wallet offers a cloud or hosted backup and Exodus does not, which matters to a beginner choosing between a phrase on paper and an account to remember. The two records agree on custody position. The record lists 9 sub-service clauses for Trust Wallet and 4 for Exodus: places where a swap, purchase or staking goes to another party.

Other comparisons

All 7 with the fields each turns on: every wallet comparison.

Compiled by the CryptoGuardz Register Desk from the Trust Wallet and Exodus records. Quotations and fields are as recorded, with retrieval dates on the full entries: Trust Wallet, Exodus. Corrections: corrections.