
Trust Wallet vs Exodus: what their terms and records say
Trust Wallet vs Exodus: what differs?
From their own documents, Trust Wallet and Exodus differ on who can block an address, the gambling clause (Trust Wallet: illegal gambling only; Exodus: not disclosed), the liability cap (100 US dollars against 1,000 US dollars) and recorded incidents (2 against 0). No winner is declared: which difference counts depends on how you use the wallet.
Documents last checked Reviewed by CryptoGuardz Register Desk, editorial desk
Disclosure: CryptoGuardz has no commercial relationship with Trust Wallet or Exodus and earns nothing if you install either. Every cell below is a field from one of the two register records, each built from documents the company publishes and dated when read. Corrections go to the corrections page.
Trust Wallet and Exodus side by side
| Field | Trust Wallet | Exodus |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Software wallet | Software wallet |
| Custody in the terms | Self-custodial, by the terms | Self-custodial, by the terms |
| Entity and governing law | Not disclosedHong Kong governing law, with a Hong Kong arbitral seat | Exodus Movement, Inc.Not stated as a jurisdiction of incorporation |
| Who can block an address | None disclosed in the documents read | The wallet provider, under its own terms |
| Gambling clause | Illegal gambling only | Not disclosed |
| Liability cap | 100 US dollars | 1,000 US dollars |
| Incidents on record | 2Latest 2025-12-24 | 0None found in primary sources; not proof of none |
| Cloud or hosted backup | Offered | Not offered |
| Sub-service clauses | 9 | 4 |
| Chains named | Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Tron, TON | Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB Chain, Solana |
| Terms read | Trust Wallet Terms of Service, last updated 1 January 2024Retrieved 2026-09-22 from trustwallet.com | Exodus Terms of Use, last updated 16 February 2026Retrieved 2026-09-28 from exodus.com |
What differs, and who it matters to
This comparison reads two records and declares no winner. Trust Wallet's binding document is the Trust Wallet Terms of Service, last updated 1 January 2024; Exodus's is the Exodus Terms of Use, last updated 16 February 2026. On who can block an address, Trust Wallet: none disclosed in the documents read; Exodus: the wallet provider, under its own terms. That matters to anyone sending to an address a screening tool might flag, a casino deposit address included. On gambling, Trust Wallet's terms: illegal gambling only; Exodus's: not disclosed. That matters to anyone funding a casino from the wallet, because a breach can cost access to the app. On liability, Trust Wallet's terms: capped at 100 US dollars; Exodus's: capped at 1,000 US dollars. That matters only if the software itself causes a loss. The record holds 2 primary-source incidents for Trust Wallet and 0 for Exodus; a count of disclosures, not a measure of safety, and it matters most to past customers whose contact details or keys were involved. Trust Wallet's binding document does not name a contracting company, which matters to anyone who may need to bring a claim. Trust Wallet offers a cloud or hosted backup and Exodus does not, which matters to a beginner choosing between a phrase on paper and an account to remember. The two records agree on custody position. The record lists 9 sub-service clauses for Trust Wallet and 4 for Exodus: places where a swap, purchase or staking goes to another party.