CryptoGuardzIndependent crypto register
Read the binding document, check it against the issuing register, publish the disagreement18+ · Gambling carries risk of loss

Choose a language

The register is published in these languages. If this page has no version in one of them, you go to that language’s home page.

Photo: Jason Dent / UnsplashWallet register · comparisons

Compare crypto wallets: 7 pairs, side by side from their terms

In short, from the documents

Which crypto wallets can be compared here?

7 comparisons cover 9 wallets, 3 of them hardware, each pair read from the two register records and nothing else. 8 of the 9 are self-custodial by their own terms. Every pair page sets out custody, the company in the terms, who can block an address, the gambling clause, liability and incidents. No winner is declared on any of them.

Documents last checked Reviewed by CryptoGuardz Register Desk, editorial desk

These are the wallet match-ups people search for: Trezor or Ledger, MetaMask or Trust Wallet, Phantom or Solflare. Each comparison takes the two wallets’ register records, built from the documents the provider publishes, and lays them out field by field. The question the documents settle is who can stop you: whether the provider holds a key, whether it or another party in the app can block an address, and what the terms say about sending funds to a casino.

A comparison reads documents; it does not test the app, so it cannot tell you how the app behaves on a given day. A self-custody claim in marketing copy is only as good as the binding document behind it, which is why the custody column reads the terms and not the homepage. The full entries quote every clause with the date it was read.

Every comparison

7 wallet comparisons, in the order the register lists them. Not ranked.
ComparisonCustodyWho can block an addressGambling clauseIncidents
Trezor vs LedgerTrezor: Self-custodial, by the termsLedger: Self-custodial, by the termsTrezor: None disclosed in the documents readLedger: Another party in the stackTrezor: Not disclosedLedger: Illegal gambling onlyTrezor: 3Ledger: 0
MetaMask vs Trust WalletMetaMask: Self-custodial, by the termsTrust Wallet: Self-custodial, by the termsMetaMask: Another party in the stackTrust Wallet: None disclosed in the documents readMetaMask: Not disclosedTrust Wallet: Illegal gambling onlyMetaMask: 0Trust Wallet: 2
Coinbase Wallet vs MetaMaskCoinbase Wallet: Self-custodial, by the termsMetaMask: Self-custodial, by the termsCoinbase Wallet: Another party in the stackMetaMask: Another party in the stackCoinbase Wallet: Illegal gambling onlyMetaMask: Not disclosedCoinbase Wallet: 0MetaMask: 0
Phantom vs SolflarePhantom: Not settled by the termsSolflare: Self-custodial, by the termsPhantom: None disclosed; the terms deny the powerSolflare: None disclosed in the documents readPhantom: Not disclosedSolflare: Not disclosedPhantom: 0Solflare: 0
Trust Wallet vs ExodusTrust Wallet: Self-custodial, by the termsExodus: Self-custodial, by the termsTrust Wallet: None disclosed in the documents readExodus: The wallet provider, under its own termsTrust Wallet: Illegal gambling onlyExodus: Not disclosedTrust Wallet: 2Exodus: 0
Tangem vs LedgerTangem: Self-custodial, by the termsLedger: Self-custodial, by the termsTangem: None disclosed in the documents readLedger: Another party in the stackTangem: Not disclosedLedger: Illegal gambling onlyTangem: 2Ledger: 0
Trezor vs TangemTrezor: Self-custodial, by the termsTangem: Self-custodial, by the termsTrezor: None disclosed in the documents readTangem: None disclosed in the documents readTrezor: Not disclosedTangem: Not disclosedTrezor: 3Tangem: 2

Comparisons by wallet

Start from the wallet you hold or are about to install. Each is listed with every comparison it appears in and its own safety page.

9 wallets appear in a comparison. A pair is built when people search for it; every other wallet on the register is read on its own entry and in the sorted list.

Compiled by the CryptoGuardz Register Desk from the wallet records. First published 2026-10-14, last reviewed 2026-10-07. Corrections: corrections.