CryptoGuardzIndependent crypto register
Read the binding document, check it against the issuing register, publish the disagreement18+ · Gambling carries risk of loss

Choose a language

The register is published in these languages. If this page has no version in one of them, you go to that language’s home page.

Photo: Leo_Visions / UnsplashRegister entry · luckyblock.com

Lucky Block

In short, from the documents

What does the register show about Lucky Block?

Lucky Block's licence is not confirmed in the issuing authority's register. 6 contradictions between its marketing and its binding terms are documented, 1 at high severity. Payout index 18/100, from 2 of 5 components. No withdrawal test has been run on it. Identity checks before payout: required before withdrawal. Its terms name 30 restricted countries in full.

Documents last checked Reviewed by CryptoGuardz Register Desk, editorial desk

Disclosure: CryptoGuardz has no commercial relationship with Lucky Block and earns nothing if you sign up with them. Status and score are derived from the data below by the formula published at our methodology page, the same way as for operators we do have a relationship with.

score 18 of 100 at low confidence · 2 of 5 components measured · 6 documented contradictions · licence not confirmed · 7 recorded gaps · 7 sources

1. What this means for you

Consequences first, in the conditional, each one produced by a document Lucky Block publishes itself or by the register of the authority that licensed it. Every line links to the section that proves it.

What can happen to you, and what in the document allows it

7 conditions, each one read out of a document Lucky Block publishes itself, out of the register of the authority that licensed it, or out of the limits of what this register has measured. Each link lands on the evidence.

Lucky Block front page, laptop view, 2026-09-28
Lucky Block front page, phone view, 2026-09-28
luckyblock.com as served to a visitor in the United States, 2026-09-28.

2. The score, component by component

Lucky Block scores 18 out of 100, at low confidence, from 2 of five components. The formula is published in full at our methodology page so any reader can recompute it from the data on this page.

low confidence · 2 of 5 components

7.9 ÷ 45 × 100 = 18Lucky Block earned 7.9 of the 45 points that could be measured, scaled to 100. The other 55 points have no data yet and are left out, not scored as zero.

2 of 5 components have data7.9/45
  1. Licence verification0/30

    No licence number found.

  2. Claim consistency7.9/15

    Documented contradictions between marketing claims and binding terms or registers: 1 high, 3 medium, 2 low. Only high and medium decay this component.

no datan/a / 55
  1. Measured payout speedn/a / 25
    No data yetExcluded from the denominator, so the maximum drops by 25

    No first-party withdrawal test has been run yet, so this component is excluded from the denominator rather than counted as zero.

  2. On-chain wallet healthn/a / 20
    No data yetExcluded from the denominator, so the maximum drops by 20

    No hot wallet has been identified for this operator, so this component is excluded from the denominator rather than counted as zero.

  3. Independent safety ratingn/a / 10
    No data yetExcluded from the denominator, so the maximum drops by 10

    No independent safety index found.

Components marked no data are excluded from the denominator rather than counted as zero, so Lucky Block is not punished for a measurement we have not made.

ComponentBasis
Licence verificationNo licence number found.
Measured payout speedNo first-party withdrawal test has been run yet, so this component is excluded from the denominator rather than counted as zero.
On-chain wallet healthNo hot wallet has been identified for this operator, so this component is excluded from the denominator rather than counted as zero.
Claim consistencyDocumented contradictions between marketing claims and binding terms or registers: 1 high, 3 medium, 2 low. Only high and medium decay this component.
Independent safety ratingNo independent safety index found.

3. What we could not verify

Every register entry carries this section, and it sits third rather than last because the limits of a check belong beside its results.

  • The legal entity that operates luckyblock.com. None is named in any document read.
  • Any licence. Neither the Curacao nor the Anjouan register lists one, and other authorities were not searched.
  • The footer licence block, which rendered empty from a United States exit address; whether it shows licence text in other countries was not tested.
  • The provider behind the "Buy Crypto" card purchase.
  • Bonus expiry period, which the bonus terms do not state.
  • Casino Guru rating, blocked by a Cloudflare check.
  • First-party withdrawal test. Not yet run.

4. Licence and who operates it

Lucky Block states a licence on its own site. We could not confirm it against the issuing authority’s register. That is an absence of confirmation, not evidence the licence is invalid.

Licence authorityGaming Services Provider N.V., named in the terms as the licensing bodysource · 2026-10-02A company name, not a regulator. It does not appear on the Curacao Gaming Authority register of 16 September 2026.
Licence numbernot disclosed
Register statusnot disclosed
Term startnot disclosed
Term endnot disclosed
Legal entitynot disclosed
Jurisdictionnot disclosed
Company numbernot disclosed
Registered addressnot disclosed

Other entities named in this operator’s own documents

5. Where the marketing and the terms disagree

We compare what an operator advertises against its own binding terms and against the issuing register. Lucky Block has 6 documented contradictions. Each one below cites both sides.

Exhibit 01 · high severityRecorded 2026-10-02
Claimed
Clause 22.6 of the terms gives the player "the right to lodge a complaint with our licensing body Gaming Services Provider N.V." [source]
Contradicted
The Curacao Gaming Authority register of 16 September 2026 lists no licence held by Gaming Services Provider N.V. and none for any Lucky Block entity, and the Anjouan Gaming Authority register lists no luckyblock.com domain. No document read names the company that operates the site. [source]
Exhibit 02 · medium severityRecorded 2026-10-02
Claimed
The homepage advertises "INSTANT DEPOSIT AND WITHDRAWALS" and "No More Waiting - your big wins are withdrawn instantly." [source]
Contradicted
The terms only "aim to process withdrawals within 24 hours", subject to identity and security checks (9.8), cap withdrawals at 150,000 euros per 30 days and fiat at 4,000 euros a day (9.6), and the AML policy holds any withdrawal until ID verification is done. [source]
Exhibit 03 · medium severityRecorded 2026-10-02
Claimed
The homepage says signing up preserves "your anonymity. With just an email address and a username, you will be good to log in", and that "we wouldn't ask you to provide any sensible information". [source]
Contradicted
The AML policy requires an official ID photographed with a six-digit number before any withdrawal, a separate face photograph, proof of address, and a source-of-wealth declaration above 5,000 dollars, with the account frozen until it is provided. [source]
Exhibit 04 · medium severityRecorded 2026-10-02
Claimed
The FAQ states: "Lucky Block does not charge any fees on deposits or withdrawals." [source]
Contradicted
Clause 9.2 of the terms deducts an 8 per cent fee, minimum 4 euros, from withdrawals where the deposit was not wagered once; clause 10.1 allows a 50 euro charge per chargeback; clause 7.2 deducts 10 per cent of a dormant balance each month. [source]
Exhibit 05 · low severityRecorded 2026-10-02
Claimed
The homepage banner advertises a "200% WELCOME BONUS UP TO €25,000". [source]
Contradicted
The body text of the same page describes the welcome bonus as "a 200% deposit match up to 12,500 EUR + 50 free spins". [source]
Exhibit 06 · low severityRecorded 2026-10-02
Claimed
The homepage advertises "20+ CRYPTOCURRENCIES". [source]
Contradicted
The same page refers to "a dozen supported cryptocurrencies" and names fourteen. [source]

6. Our withdrawal test

We have not yet deposited to Lucky Block or requested a withdrawal ourselves. Until we have, this section carries no measurement and the payout score above excludes that component. We publish this absence instead of repeating the operator’s own stated times as though we had verified them.

7. Money in, money out

Tanzanite, which publishes on-chain deposit volume for the larger crypto casinos, does not track Lucky Block. We have not identified a payout wallet for Lucky Block ourselves either, so there is no on-chain figure for this operator from any source we trust. That is a gap, and it is stated rather than filled. The operators that do carry a figure are listed separately.

Payout wallet

Deposit volume is money going in. The harder question is whether money comes back out, and that needs the operator’s payout wallet. We have not identified one for Lucky Block. Where a payout wallet can be identified we track its balance trend directly on chain, because a wallet draining faster than it fills is a leading signal of payment trouble while complaint volume is a lagging one. For this operator that signal is not available, which is why the on-chain component is left out of the score rather than counted as a zero.

8. Public record

Matters of public record, stated with their sources and not characterised by us. They are not scored, because a historical event is not a measurement of how this operator behaves today, but leaving them out while citing the sources would be worse.

Not yet measured. Complaints go to complaints@luckyblock.com; the only external body named is Gaming Services Provider N.V.

9. Withdrawal terms and KYC

These are Lucky Block’s own stated terms, taken from its binding documents in place of from its marketing pages. Where the two disagree, the disagreement is recorded in the section above.

Stated processing time"Subject to the satisfaction of our identity and security checks, we will aim to process withdrawals within 24 hours of a request." (9.8)source · 2026-10-02The FAQ adds an average payout time of 5 minutes for most cryptocurrencies, up to 24 hours where the team reviews the transaction.
Minimum withdrawal10 euros per transaction or the equivalent, except on account closure (9.1).source · 2026-10-02
Limits150,000 euros per rolling 30 days, or 500,000 euros for players classified as VIP. Fiat withdrawals are capped at 4,000 euros a day, 10,000 a week and 20,000 a month. An 8 per cent fee, minimum 4 euros, applies where the deposit was not wagered at least once (9.2). Dormant accounts lose 10 per cent of the balance a month after 180 days without a bet (7.2).source · 2026-10-02
When KYC is triggeredThe AML policy sets three verification steps. Step one, a self-declared form, "must be done by every user and customer to withdraw". Step two, an official ID photographed with a six-digit number plus an electronic check, "must be done by every user which deposit over 2000 EUR (two thousand Euro) or withdraws any amount". Step three, source of wealth, applies above 5,000 dollars deposited or withdrawn. Medium-risk countries trigger steps two and three at 1,000 and 2,500 dollars.source · 2026-10-02

10. Bonus terms in plain numbers

Headline offer200% welcome bonus up to 25,000 euros plus 50 free spins.source · 2026-10-02The same homepage body text gives 200% up to 12,500 euros plus 50 free spins.
Wagering requirement35 times the bonus amount.source · 2026-10-02
Maximum cashout10 times the bonus amountsource · 2026-10-02
Expirynot disclosed
Game contributionSlots 100%; table games 20%; dice, arcade, roulette and other games 0%. Maximum bet with bonus funds 5 dollars or euros per round.source · 2026-10-02

11. Coins and chains

14 coins are enumerated in Lucky Block’s own documentation: BTC, ADA, DOGE, ETH, LTC, XRP, SOL, USDT, AVAX, BNB, BCH, TRX, USDC, MATIC.

Fourteen assets are named on the homepage, Bitcoin plus a list of thirteen, against a headline claim of 20 or more. The same page elsewhere says "a dozen supported cryptocurrencies". The operator's own token, LBLOCK, is also offered for play and is not counted.

Payment methods

Lucky Block’s own pages name no payment method besides crypto. A buy-crypto option is listed without naming who runs it.

Crypto first. The "Buy Crypto" tab sells crypto by card and does not name the company that runs it. The terms refer to third-party processors for card deposits without naming any.

MethodTypeRouteDirectionRegionsSource
Crypto
CryptoCryptoDirect to balanceDeposit, withdrawalnot disclosedSource
Buy-crypto services
Buy crypto, provider not namedBuy-crypto serviceSells you cryptoDepositnot disclosedSource

Read from each page on 2026-09-28. “Direct” means Lucky Block takes the method into your balance. “Buys crypto via” means a third party sells you crypto with it and sends the crypto to Lucky Block.

12. Where you cannot use it

Restricted territoriesNorth Korea, Iran, Myanmar, Yemen, Zimbabwe, South Sudan, Afghanistan, Cuba, Iraq, Cote d'Ivoire/Ivory Coast, Liberia, Libya, Bulgaria, Malta, Sudan, Syria, USA, US Overseas Territories (American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, U.S Virgin Islands), Aruba, Curacao, French Polynesia, Lithuania, New Caledonia, Sint Maarten, St. Barthélemy, St. Martin, St. Pierre & Miquelon, U.S. Outlying Islands, Wallis & Futuna, French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Cyprussource · 2026-10-02Clause 4.1.3, introduced as "include, but are not limited to". The United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands, Spain, Germany and Australia are not named.

13. Who should avoid Lucky Block

Anyone who would be relying on the specific claims contradicted above. Clause 22.6 of the terms gives the player "the right to lodge a complaint with our licensing body Gaming Services Provider N.V." That is the claim most likely to matter at the moment you try to withdraw, and this operator’s own binding terms say something different.

14. Related entries on the register

Or browse the full payout index, the watchlist, the contradictions we have documented, or read how we rate operators.

15. Sources

About this review

Compiled by the CryptoGuardz register team. First published 2026-10-02, last reviewed 2026-10-02. Facts are drawn from the sources above; the status and score are derived by the published formula from those facts alone. Research and drafting are AI-assisted and reviewed by a named editor before publication. Corrections: corrections.