Is Rabby Wallet safe? What its own terms say
Is Rabby Wallet safe to use for casino deposits?
Rabby Wallet's terms disclaim custody but do not settle who holds key material. Its terms name no gambling rule (rabby.io, read 2026-09-28), which is an absence, not a permission. Contracting party: OPCODE LABS PTE. LTD., place of incorporation not stated. 5 points are not verified. No primary-source incident is recorded. Chains named: Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base and Polygon.
Documents last checked Reviewed by CryptoGuardz Register Desk, editorial desk
Disclosure: CryptoGuardz has no commercial relationship with Rabby Wallet, earns nothing if you install it, and has not contacted the company or given it notice of this entry. Every statement below is either a verbatim quote from a document Rabby Wallet publishes or a statement about a public record, and both carry the date they were read. Corrections go to the corrections page.
1. What this means for you
Consequences first, in the conditional, each one produced by a clause in a document Rabby Wallet publishes itself. Every line links to that clause, quoted in full and dated. None of them is a claim that Rabby Wallet can move your coins on chain: the terms disclaim that power and this register takes them at their word on it.
- Your access to the app can be withdrawn if Rabby Wallet decides to withdraw it The termination clause is discretionary and states no grounds you could stay inside. Your keys are still yours; the software you reach them through is not.
- You are contracting with someone you cannot name if you use the swap, the on-ramp or the staking inside the app 2 sub-service clauses are recorded across 2 kinds of service, and most of the counterparties are identified in the terms only as a third party.
- You can recover no more than the lower of fees paid in 12 months or 100 US dollars if Rabby Wallet is liable to you at all The aggregate liability clause caps every claim you could bring, whatever the size of the balance the software was holding the keys to.
2. What this entry records, and what it does not
This register publishes no number for a wallet. The payout score on the casino register has five defined components and a published arithmetic; no equivalent instrument exists here. What follows is a field-by-field account of what was read, where and when.
| Binding terms | Read in full6 clauses captured verbatim across 5 topics, retrieved 2026-09-28 |
|---|---|
| Contracting entity | OPCODE LABS PTE. LTD.No jurisdiction of incorporation stated in the binding document |
| Custody position in the terms | Does not settle who holds key materialThe terms say assets are stored locally on the user’s device and that Rabby will never ask for the key or phrase. They do not state in terms that Rabby has no access to key material, so the field is left open rather than set to no. |
| Sub-services | 2 clauses recordedSwap · Yield and bridging. A count of recorded clauses, not of distinct companies. |
| Code audit | Not measuredNo security audit, source review or reproducible-build check has been carried out or read by this register. A wallet's safety is largely decided there, and nothing on this page speaks to it. |
| First-party test | Not measuredNo transaction has been signed, no swap executed and no recovery flow run through this product by this register. |
| Default node provider | Not disclosedNo RPC or node provider is named in any primary document retrieved. |
3. What we could not verify
Every entry carries this section. The gaps are published because a reader deserves the limits of the check as well as its results.
- Whether Rabby has any access to key material. The terms do not say so in terms either way.
- The relationship between Rabby and DeBank, whose name titles the terms page.
- OPCODE LABS PTE. LTD.’s registration details. Not stated in the terms.
- Which EVM chains are supported by name. The homepage says all EVM chains.
- Documented incidents. Not searched for in this pass.
4. Who you are contracting with
The binding document names a company. It does not name a jurisdiction of incorporation, which is a different and smaller gap: a reader can find the counterparty but not the register it sits in.
| Named counterparty | OPCODE LABS PTE. LTD.source · retrieved 2026-09-28 |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Not stated as a jurisdiction of incorporation. The terms select the law of the State of Texas and JAMS arbitration. |
| Relationships disclosed | The terms page is titled Debank & Rabby. No relationship between the two is described in the terms read. |
OPCODE LABS PTE. LTD. (“Rabby”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our”) is a blockchain development companyrabby.io
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas.rabby.io
5. The custody claim, and what the binding document says
The homepage makes no custody claim in the text retrieved. The custody description sits in the terms: the wallet lets users store assets locally on their own devices.
These include Rabby Wallet, which enables users to (i) store locally on their own devices, tokens, cryptocurrencies and other crypto or any digital assetrabby.io · 2026-09-28
we will never ask you for your private key or secret recovery phrase (the “Recovery Phrase”) or for you to make a payment to us.rabby.io
6. Recovery, and where the terms and the marketing differ
| Cloud or hosted backup offered | no |
|---|---|
| What is stored | Not described in the terms beyond local storage on the user’s device. |
| Where | On the user’s device. |
| Changes the custody position | no |
No difference found. The homepage makes no recovery claim and the terms make only the local-storage statement.
7. The app is not the wallet
2 clauses, each one a place where the product routes a user to a counterparty the user never contracts with by name, under terms the user never opens. The count is of recorded clauses and not of distinct companies: two entries can name the same counterparty and each still be a separate thing the terms permit.
swap assets on a peer-to-peer basis via third-party Dappsrabby.io
The bridge is one of the means of accessing the protocol, and it may not be the exclusive means of accessing the protocolrabby.io
8. Withdrawing your access to the interface
Your keys are yours. The software you reach them through is licensed, and the licence can be withdrawn. 2 clauses are recorded on this point.
WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO, IN OUR SOLE DISCRETION AND WITHOUT NOTICE OR LIABILITY, DENY ACCESS TO AND USE OF THE SERVICES (INCLUDING BLOCKING CERTAIN IP ADDRESSES), TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY REASON OR FOR NO REASONrabby.io
We reserve the right to suspend or terminate your Account or suspend your right to access or use any portion or all of the Offerings immediately if we determine:rabby.io
9. Who can block an address
Rabby Wallet claims no power to block an address in the documents read. No clause in the documents read discloses that another party in the stack can freeze or blacklist an address either. That is an absence of disclosure, not a guarantee that no such party exists.
10. What the terms say about gambling
Position recorded: not disclosed. No clause naming gambling, betting, casinos or wagering was found in the documents read. That is an absence in the documents, not a permission, and the general prohibition on unlawful use still applies.
The card side of the same question is on the card register, and the casino side on KYC on withdrawal.
11. Chains it names
Of the eight chains this register filters on, Rabby Wallet names 4: Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Polygon. Not named on the pages read: Solana, Bitcoin, TON, Tron. The homepage says all EVM chains and names none. The four EVM chains in this register’s filter are listed on that basis. Solana, Bitcoin, TON and Tron are not EVM chains.
Best Choice for All EVM Chainsrabby.io
12. Liability, amendment, arbitration and where you can use it
The aggregate liability clause caps every claim you could bring at the lower of fees paid in 12 months or 100 US dollars, whatever the balance involved. It is the clause that decides what the rest of the document is worth.
IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COMPANY PARTIES' TOTAL LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ALL DAMAGES (OTHER THAN AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW IN CASES INVOLVING PERSONAL INJURY) EXCEED THE LOWER OF (I) THE TOTAL AMOUNT PAID BY YOU HEREUNDER FOR THE OFFERINGS GIVING RISE TO THE LIABILITY IN THE TWELVE MONTHS PRECEDING THE FIRST INCIDENT OUT OF WHICH THE LIABILITY AROSE, OR, (II) THE AMOUNT OF ONE HUNDRED U.S. DOLLARS ($USD101.00)rabby.io
The words say one hundred dollars and the figure in brackets says 101. The lower of the two limbs applies, so a user who paid nothing is capped at zero on the clause’s own arithmetic.
We may modify these Terms at any time and in our sole discretion.rabby.io
THIS AGREEMENT IS SUBJECT TO BINDING ARBITRATION AS DETAILED IN SECTION 1.rabby.io
not located in any country subject to a comprehensive sanctions program implemented by the United States.rabby.io
13. Public record
No incident is recorded for Rabby Wallet. That is not a clean bill of health. No primary source, meaning a company disclosure, a public vulnerability register entry or a regulator action, was located within this collection. Absence of a record here is the absence of a search result.
14. Who should avoid Rabby Wallet
Anyone who needs a named party to be answerable for a loss. The liability position is the lower of fees paid in 12 months or 100 US dollars, and the terms disclaim responsibility for every third-party service the app routes you into.
Related entries
Or read the whole wallet register, the card register, the same method applied to exchanges and to crypto casinos, the clause library at clause watch, or how this register works.